Basic HTML Version
509
passive justification as being actual and declarative justification correct or not? Can we say that
in declarative justification (passive justification) God simply declares the sinner to be what he
is? What becomes of the doctrine of justification in Schleiermacher, Ritchl, and modern liberal
theology?
LITERATURE:
Bavinck, Geref. Dogm., IV, pp. 182-245; Kuyper, Dict. Dogm., De Salute, pp. 45-69;
ibid., Het Werk van den Heiligen Geest II, pp. 204-232; Comrie, Brief over de
Rechtvaardigmaking; Hodge, Syst. Theol. III, pp. 114-212; Shedd, Dogm. Theol. II, pp. 538-552;
Dick, Theology, Lectures LXXI-LXXIII; Dabney, Syst and Polem. Theol., pp. 618-650; Mastricht,
Godgeleerdheit VI. 6 and 7; Buchanan, The Doctrine of Justification; Owen, On Justification;
Litton, Introd. to Dogm. Theol., pp. 259-313; Girardeau, Calvinism and Evangelical Arminianism,
pp. 413-566; Pieper, Christl. Dogm. II, pp. 606-672; Vos, Geref. Dogm. IV., pp. 154-210; Schmid,
Doct. Theol. of the Ev. Luth. Church, pp. 430-448; Valentine, Chr. Theol. II, pp. 214-241; Strong,
Syst. Theol., pp. 849-868; Dorner, Syst. of Chr. Doct. IV, pp. 194-238; Watson, Theological
Institutes, II, pp. 406-475; De Moor, Rechtvaardigmaking van Eeuwigheid.