Page 244 - Systematic Theology - Louis Berkhof

Basic HTML Version

242
Amyraldus’ view of universal atonement? What objection does Dabney raise to the doctrine of
immediate imputation? Is the doctrine of inherited evil the same as the doctrine of original sin,
and if not, how do they differ? How do Pelagians, Semi-Pelagians, and Arminians differ in their
view of original sin? How does the doctrine of original sin affect the doctrine of infant
salvation? Does the Bible teach that one can be lost purely as the result of orginal sin? What is
the connection between the doctrine of original sin and that of baptismal regeneration? What
becomes of the doctrine of original sin in modern liberal theology? How do you account for the
denial of original sin in Barthian theology? Can you name some additional classes of actual sins?
LITERATURE:
Bavinck, Geref. Dogm. III, pp. 61-120; Kuyper, Dict. Dogm., De Peccato, pp. 36-50,
119-144; Vos, Geref. Dogm. II, pp. 31-76; Hodge, Syst. Theol. II, pp. 192-308; McPherson, Chr.
Dogma, pp. 242-256; Dabney, Syst. and Polem. Theol., pp. 321-351; Litton, Intro. to Dogm.
Theol., pp. 136-174; Schmid, Doct. Theol. of the Ev. Luth. Ch., pp. 242-276; Valentine, Chr.
Theol. I, pp. 420-476; Pope, Chr. Theol. II, pp. 47-86; Raymond, Syst. Theol. II, pp. 64-172;
Wilmers, Handbook of the Chr. Religion, pp. 235-238; Mackintosh, Christianity and Sin, cf.
Index; Girardeau,The Will in its Theological Relations; Wiggers, Augustinism and Pelagianism;
Candlish, The Bibl. Doct. of Sin, pp. 90-128; Brunner, Man in Revolt, pp. 114-166.